Twitter
RSS

Roger Federer vs Pete Sampras MSG Highlights

roger federer , videos de tenis, tips para jugar tenis

Related posts:

  1. Federer medirá su tenis con Pete Sampras en un partido de exhibición en Macao
  2. Tennis -Sampras – tributo a Pete Sampras – US open 2003 1/2
  3. Tennis -Sampras tributo a Pete Sampras – US open 2003 2/2
  4. Pete Sampras vs Boris Becker [ MASTERS 196 ] 2º set – 4/6
  5. Roger Federer vs top players.(Sampras,Nadal etc!)

25 Responses to “Roger Federer vs Pete Sampras MSG Highlights”

  1. SSJ4Razor dice:

    @LittleVinnyCock Your logic is absolutly flawed rofl. 1 federer had to beat far greater people than burdych looool. 2. washed up? he won the australian open this year & played the best tennis he has in years. 3. Nadal wont pass him in Grand slams end. you need to do your reasearch before you run your mouth. Agassi, Sampras, Stefin are all greater than anyone Nadal has had to go through – federer. you know nothing.

  2. LittleVinnyCock dice:

    @SSJ4Razor That Austrailian is federer’s last slam he will win.Nadal is taking over now.He will break 16 in the next 3 years.

  3. SSJ4Razor dice:

    @LittleVinnyCock Rofl have you actually heard yourself? Nadal is taking over? oh dear.

  4. drippingfang dice:

    @mydog8u2 You seem to be forgetting that Henman never won anything because Sampras was around! I think all would like to see Pete at his peak play Federer on grass, pinpoint serving, 2nd shot volleys sliding away from Federer right near the back line & we’ll see what return Federer can muster..quite a few would be great returns but many would be high just like everyone else’s with the same result, 3 shots, point won Sampras. At wimbledon, at any rate. I agree with your comments otherwise though

  5. MacDaddy635 dice:

    listen mydog the serve and volley is still a solid part of the game. Nadal can hit massive winners from good deep shots so would u say players shoulndt hit decent shots because they can be beaten? If u hit a good serve u run up to the net to put it away, if u play tennis u would know.

  6. konvictz0007 dice:

    serve and volley cannot be succesful, the quality of passing shots from the baseline has increased dramatically, therefore you will just get caught out.

    also sticking to the baseline will not gurantee you success because it is almost imposible to break down players like nadal and federer from there. actually federer now probably cannot compete with nadal from the baseline simply because of his ability to return difficult balls into winners.

    the best is to mix both up, like current federer…

  7. locacris23 dice:

    verlos jugar es como ver a dos clones!!! el Rey Roger y el Rey Pete!!

  8. earlybird38 dice:

    WOW what happened to Sampras in this game damn he sucked. Well I guess Sampras was up in age and losing his game. That I think is the same that is going on with Federer he is getting older and now Nadal is taking his spot. “In with the new and out with the old.”

  9. AlphaDraconis7 dice:

    i just can NEVER imagine anyone being better at tennis than ROGER FEDERER…

    ok..rafael nadal has won 8 grand slams..but please, he is NOT as skillfull or creative as federer…federer is a GENIUS with a tennis racquet. some of the shots he comes up with are just not human..ive never seen a player as naturally talented as federer. nadal..call me crazy, but alot of the points he wins are with his legs..he is a physical MONSTER. plus the spins he puts on the ball are incredible..

  10. AlphaDraconis7 dice:

    @SSJ4Razor

    nadal is not as NATURALLY TALENTED as federer…rafa has had to work very hard to become as good as he is today…a few years ago his volleying was not good and his serve was weak..now he’s improved almost all aspects of his game..

    but federer is just the BEST..he is a genius with a tennis racquet. he has every shot in the book..and isn’t so much a grinder like rafa is.

  11. mikulasvselicha dice:

    @mydog8u2 Stepanek does it even nowadays :-)

  12. c1ee dice:

    @mydog8u2 It’s not because players are any better at passing these days. Tennis racquet technology is bringing more and more topspin to tennis shots, and top spin in the enemy of a volleyer.

  13. HCNguyen86 dice:

    Federer’s success comes from his amazing foot work.. however in this video you can clearly see the disadvantage of Serve $ Volley.

  14. gr8tgoogelymoogely dice:

    Tiger Woods in the crowd at the end..LOL..I wonder which whore he was sleeping with at this time outside of marriage

  15. TJFederer15 dice:

    To of the greatest players, great to watch

  16. SatelliteSD dice:

    @llss882 exactly what I thought!

  17. iosonodella2i dice:

    tiger woods? lol!

  18. farzanjava dice:

    I would have paid a thousand dollars to watch this game on the last row

  19. CeruleanTwist dice:

    Pete’s Serve and Volley gets smashed by Federer’s Genius

  20. claus1225 dice:

    this is the way tennis is supposed to be played. smooth and elegant and fast.

    none of that nadal grunting running around ass scratching ass slow serve shiet

  21. WithTheBass dice:

    I HAVE HIS OLD RACQUET. K STAFF ORIGINAL. BOUGHT IN 85. =] my dad handed it down to me. and ive discarded my babolat prodrive for this gem

  22. jtatsiue dice:

    @AlphaDraconis7, very true, add his mental toughness and you’ve got his recipe for success, still he’s becoming pretty adept at the net as he proved during his domination at Wimbledon

  23. jtatsiue dice:

    @drippingfang, Pete hit the very volley you described, a sliced backhander sliding away from Fed and Fed tracked it down and hit a brilliant passing shot down the line for a winner. A 19 yr. old Fed beat Pete by outplaying him from the net, the match contained 174 serve and volley points. Even at 19, Fed already had a better grass/all-court game than Pete, granted Pete was near retirement. If both players are in their prime I’d still favor Fed.

  24. AndresRoddick1 dice:

    Federer is like the varsity player at a highschool playing against his coach.

  25. stemilano97 dice:

    @gr8tgoogelymoogely hahahahaha LOL

Leave a Reply